Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movies. Show all posts

20 October, 2009

(500) Days of Summer

I am not a fan of romantic comedies. Usually, I put the film on my computer, I watch it and then immediately delete it. It was not the case with (500) Days of Summer. I liked this movie with Joseph Gordon-Levitt and Zooey Dechanel. Not in a wow-what-a-great-movie way, but I just thought the manner in which love and relationships were presented were interesting and very close to reality. The notion that it's not a typical romantic comedy is being repeated many times, and although it doesn't succeed to avoid some cliches, it is still refreshing and touchingly narrated story.

My favorite scene of the movie is the representation of how the boy feels after he gets the girl he liked for some time. It's a little bit cheesy, but haven't we all felt like running around and dancing when we've realized we are happy in love?



What i also liked is the retro feel of the whole film. Both Zooey Dechanel's and Joseph Gordon-Levitt's clothes are super-cute.

31 March, 2009

Ozpetek

A week dedicated to the Italian film took place in the Cinematheque of Macedonia in Skopje with a retrospective to the work of Ferzan Ozpetek, a Turkish-Italian director, very famous for his sexual orientation (openly gay and fighting for the rights of the homosexual).

The first film, with which the "Window to the Italian Cinema" was opened was "Bagno Turco (Hamam)" ("Turkish Bath"). It's a story of a man from Italy (Alessandro Gassman, incredibly handsome!) coming to Istanbul after the death of his aunt in order to sell the property left to him. There, somehow, he starts a new life and a sexual relationship with a young boy, which he chooses over his wife, who has come to visit him, see what has been going on and tell him that she has an affair with their friend. They all get enchanted by the Hamam and at the end, after the man (Gassman, incredibly handsome!) gets killed (by the people who want to build a commercial center in that area) his wife stays in Istanbul and continues to run the hamam.

The second film was "Le Fate Ignoranti" ("His Secret Life") where a woman, after the death of her husband discovers that he had a male lover. Out of curiosity, she wants to meet her husband's lover, but then she continues to see him, and moreover, she makes friends with the other people in his circle.

The third film was "La Finestra di Fronte" ("Facing Window"). It is a story of a young woman leading a more-or-less normal life with a husband and two kids, trying to make ends meet at the end of the month. One day she and her husband meet an old man on the street that seems has lost his memory. With the way Italian bureaucracy works, they can't get him to an institution and he stays with them. Even from here the story seems unconvincing, and it just continues to develop more and more unconvincingly until the end of the film. What is unavoidable in Ozpetek films is that the old man is actually gay and longs for the memory of his long lost lover. Once again, all the male characters are incredibly handsome and I get to think that it may be a good enough reason to watch Ozpetek movies! There is Raoul Bova, a character not developed at all, who seems to be in love with Giovanna (the woman), but again unconvincingly. The moral of the movie would be "live your life, and don't let it slip away" - a lame enough message that when presented like this becomes even lamer.

The fourth film was "Cuore Sacro" ("Sacred Heart"). For once, Ozpetek tried to work on something other than gay people and dysfunctional marriages. However, again somewhat unconvincingly. The plot of the film would be the transition of a woman from a work-a-holic, consumerist, loner.. into a caring, compassionate, pretty much "saintly" person. It was a hard-to-swallow movie and, now that I think of it, I can't really say much about it.

The fifth and last film was "Saturno Contro" ("Saturn in Opposition"). Here Ozperek returns to his usual story: gay couple very much in love and functioning perfectly, heterosexual couples with dysfunctional marriages, the usual smart Turkish female character.. and no point in the end.
When I started writing I didn't think that I disliked Ozpetek this much, but seems that it just came out of me.. Thank you very much, I prefer Tornatore, and even Gabriele Muccino's romantic comedies. Ozpetek is simply not for me.

26 February, 2009

The Reader

I have read the book almost a year ago and I adored it. It kept me thinking for days. I tried to understand the force of love and lust that kept Michael incapable of loving anyone else for the rest of his life. I thought about the force of shame and self-respect. Are there really such people that would sacrifice their life just to avoid shame? Most of all, I was wondering how come an illegitimate love of a 15-years old and a woman of 40 seemed so natural and normal to me. I adore writers that succeed in representing things as though they are the most natural thing that could happen although in reality they would seem improbable.

I saw the film a couple of days ago. First of all, I don't think Kate Winslet was the right choice for the role, even though I truly admire her acting skills and I really think she deserved an Oscar (but maybe for another movie?!). The way I imagined the woman when I was reading the book was someone not so beautiful, a person who has lived and at whose face there are traces of the life she passed. She wouldn't be so slim, and she would have bigger breasts, but these are smaller details mainly part of one's imagination. Now that I think of another actress that would be right for the role, no one comes to my mind.. Is it possible that Kate is the only acclaimed actress who has a few pounds in eccess??? I'll think about this.. However, what I wanted to say is that I rarely watch a movie after a book and really get into it. The only movie that was everything I imagined while I was reading the book was Parfume (I'll say something more on that matter some other time), and I have to admit that The Reader was not far from it. I enjoyed it, and apart from some minor imperfections, I can say that it was an excellent representation of the book. Talking about imperfections, I think that the part of Michael communicating with his daughter could have been a little bit shorter. It was to depict how every his relationship with a woman was unsuccessful, and we got that with just two phrazes spoken between them.

To conclude, even with rare examples of good films I'm going to stick to books. No film can replace my imagination.